Monitorování účinnosti v psychoterapii a poradenství

č.7(2016)

Abstrakt

Ve výzkumu psychoterapie a poradenství se v posledních letech prosazuje tzv. na praxi orientovaný výzkum, jehož cílem je zkoumat proces a efekt psychoterapeutických a poradenských intervencí v podmínkách běžné praxe. V terapeutických a poradenských zařízeních v západním světě se stále častěji začínají používat softwarové systémy průběžně monitorující efekt nabízené péče. Výzkumy ukazují, že používání zpětnovazebních informací z těchto systémů má pozitivní vliv na účinnost terapeutické a poradenské praxe. V tomto příspěvku budou nastíněny principy fungování těchto systémů a dále budou shrnuty přínosy i limity rutinního monitorování účinnosti a jeho implementace do praxe.

In psychotherapy and counseling research, practice-oriented research has been gaining momentum recently. Its aim is to study the process and the outcome of psychotherapy and counseling interventions in routine practice. In the Western world, therapeutic and counseling facilities are increasingly beginning to use software systems to continually monitor the effect of treatment offered. Research evidence shows that using this outcome information as feedback has a positive impact on the effectiveness of therapy and counseling practice. In this paper, the principles upon which these systems work will be summarized, as well as the benefits and limitations of routine outcome monitoring and its implementation into practice.


Klíčová slova:
účinnost psychoterapie; monitorování účinku; zpětná vazba; implementace; psychotherapy effectiveness; outcome monitoring; feedback; implementation
Reference
Ashworth, M., Robinson, S. I., Godfrey, E., Parmentier, H., Shepherd, M., Christey, J., … Matthews, V. (2005). The experiences of therapists using a new client-centred psychometric instrument, PSYCHLOPS (Psychological Outcome Profiles). Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 5(1), 37–42. doi:10.1080/14733140512331343886

Barlow, D. H. (2010). Negative effects from psychological treatments: A perspective. The American Psychologist, 65(1), 13–20. doi:10.1037/a0015643

Bergin, A. E., & Lambert, M. J. (1978). The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis (2nd ed., pp. 139–189). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Beckstead, D. J., Hatch, A. L., Lamert, M. J., Eggett, D. L., Goates, M. K., & Vermeersch, D. A. (2003). Clinical significance of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2). The Behavior Analyst Today, 4(1), 86–97. doi:10.1037/h0100015

Bickman, L., Kelley, S. D., Breda, C., de Andrade, A. R., & Riemer, M. (2011). Effects of routine feedback to clinicians on mental health outcomes of youths: Results of a randomized trial. Psychiatric Services, 62(12), 1423–1429. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.002052011

Boswell, J. F., Kraus, D. R., Miller, S. D., & Lambert, M. J. (2015). Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions. Psychotherapy Research, 25(1), 6–19. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.817696

Bringhurst, D. L., Watson, C. W., Miller, S. D., & Duncan, B. L. (2006). The reliability and validity of the Outcome Rating Scale: A replication study of a brief clinical measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 5(1), 23–30.

Campbell, A., & Hemsley, S. (2009). Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale in psychological practice: Clinical utility of ultra-brief measures. Clinical Psychologist, 13(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/13284200802676391

Carlier, I. V. E., Meuldijk, D., Van Vliet, I. M., Van Fenema, E., Van Der Wee, N. J. A., & Zitman, F. G. (2012). Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: Evidence and theory. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(1), 104–110. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01543.x

Castonguay, L. G., Barkham, M., Lutz, W., & McAleavey, A. (2013). Practice-oriented research: Approaches and applications. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 85–133). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

De Jong, K., van Sluis, P., Nugter, M. A., Heiser, W. J., & Spinhoven, P. (2012). Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy Research, 22(4), 464–474. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.673023

De Jong, K., Timman, R., Hakkaart-Van Roijen, L., Vermeulen, P., Kooiman, K., Passchier, J., & Busschbach, J. Van. (2014). The effect of outcome monitoring feedback to clinicians and patients in short and long-term psychotherapy: A randomized controlled trial. Psychotherapy Research, 24(6), 629–639. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.871079

Doran, J. M., Westerman, A. R., Kraus, J., Jock, W., Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2015, June). Do all roads lead to Rome? A critical analysis of agreement and divergence in qualitative and quantitative descriptors of change. Poster presented at the 46th International Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Duncan, B. L. (2012). The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS): The Heart and Soul of Change Project. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 53(2), 93–104. doi:10.1037/a0027762

Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., Sparks, J. A., Claud, D. A., Reynolds, L. R., Brown, J., & Johnson, L. D. (2003). The Session Rating Scale: Preliminary psychometric properties of a “working” alliance measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 3(1), 3–12.

Elliott, R., Mack, C., & Shapiro, D. A. (1999). Simplified Personal Questionnaire procedure. Retrieved from http://www.experiential-researchers.org/instruments/elliott/pqprocedure.html

Elliott, R., & Rodgers, B. (2008). Client Change Interview. Retrieved from http://www.drbrianrodgers.com/research/client-change-interview

Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J., & Audin, K. (2002). Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 51–60. doi:10.1192/bjp.180.1.51

Evans, C., Mellor-Clark, J., Margison, F., Barkham, M., Audin, K., Connell, J., & McGrath, G. (2000). CORE: Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation. Journal of Mental Health, 9(3), 247–255. doi:10.1080/jmh.9.3.247.255

Garland, A. F., Kruse, M., & Aarons, G. A. (2003). Clinicians and outcome measurement: What’s the use? The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 30(4), 393–405. doi:10.1007/BF02287427

Hannan, C., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D. W., Shimokawa, K., & Sutton, S. W. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 155–163. doi:10.1002/jclp.20108

Hansen, N. B., Lambert, M. J., & Forman, E. M. (2002). The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(3), 329–343. doi:10.1093/clipsy/9.3.329

Harmon, C., Hawkins, E. J., Lambert, M. J., Slade, K., & Whipple, J. L. (2005). Improving outcomes for poorly responding clients: The use of clinical support tools and feedback to clients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 175–185. doi:10.1002/jclp.20109

Hatfield, D., McCullough, L., Frantz, S. H. B., & Krieger, K. (2010). Do we know when our clients get worse? An investigation of therapists’ ability to detect negative client change. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 17(1), 25–32. doi:10.1002/cpp.656

Hawkins, E. J., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Slade, K. L., & Tuttle, K. C. (2004). The therapeutic effects of providing patient progress information to therapists and patients. Psychotherapy Research, 14(3), 308–327. doi:10.1093/ptr/kph027

Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12

Knaup, C., Koesters, M., Schoefer, D., Becker, T., & Puschner, B. (2009). Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: Meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 195(1), 15–22. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053967

Kraus, D. R. (2012). The Treatment Outcome Package (TOP). Integrating Science and Practice, 2(2), 43–45.

Kraus, D. R., Castonguay, L. G., Boswell, J. F., Nordberg, S. S., & Hayes, J. A. (2011). Therapist effectiveness: Implications for accountability and patient care. Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 267–276. doi:10.1080/10503307.2011.563249

Kraus, D. R., Seligman, D. A., & Jordan, J. R. (2005). Validation of a behavioral health treatment outcome and assessment tool designed for naturalistic settings: The treatment outcome package. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(3), 285–314. doi:10.1002/jclp.20084

Lambert, M. J. (2013a). Outcome in psychotherapy: The past and important advances. Psychotherapy, 50(1), 42–51. doi:10.1037/a0030682

Lambert, M. J. (2013b). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 169–218). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., Umphress, V., Hansen, N. B., Vermeersch, D. A., Clouse, G. C., & Yanchar, S. C. (1996). The reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 3(4), 249-258. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0879(199612)3:4<249::aid-cpp106>3.0.co;2-s

Lambert, M. J., & Ogles, B. M. (2004). The efficacy and efffectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 307–389). New York, NY: John Wiley.

Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Hawkins, E. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Smart, D. W. (2003). Is it time for clinicians to routinely track patient outcome? A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(3), 288–301. doi:10.1093/clipsy.bpg025

Lambert, M., Whipple, J., Smart, D., Vermeersch, D., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2001). The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced? Psychotherapy Research, 11(1), 49–68. doi:10.1080/713663852

Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Hawkins, E. J., Nielsan, S. L., & Goates, M. (2002). Enhancing psychotherapy outcomes via providing feedback on client progress: A replication. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9(2), 91–103. doi:10.1002/cpp.324

Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. The American Psychologist, 48(12), 1181–1209. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.12.1181

Lutz, W., Böhnke, J. R., & Köck, K. (2011). Lending an ear to feedback systems: Evaluation of recovery and non-response in psychotherapy in a German outpatient setting. Community Mental Health Journal, 47(3), 311–317. doi:10.1007/s10597-010-9307-3

Lutz, W., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, S. C., Tschitsaz, A., Schürch, E., & Stulz, N. (2006). The probability of treatment success, failure and duration — What can be learned from empirical data to support decision making in clinical practice? Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13(4), 223–232. doi:10.1002/cpp.496

Lutz, W., Stulz, N., Martinovich, Z., Leon, S., & Saunders, S. M. (2009). Methodological background of decision rules and feedback tools for outcomes management in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4-5), 502–510. doi:10.1080/10503300802688486

Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., Brown, J., Sparks, J. A., & Claud, D. A. (2003). The Outcome Rating Scale: A preliminary study of the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a brief visual analog measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 2(2), 91–100.

Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., & Hubble, M. A. (2004). Beyond integration: The triumph of outcome over process in clinical practice. Psychotherapy in Australia, 10(2), 2–19.

Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., Sorrell, R., & Brown, G. S. (2005). The Partners for Change Outcome Management System. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 199–208. doi:10.1002/jclp.20111

Miller, S. D., Hubble, M. A., Chow, D. L., & Seidel, J. A. (2013). The outcome of psychotherapy: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Psychotherapy, 50(1), 88–97. doi:10.1037/a0031097

Sandell, R. (1987). Assessing the effects of psychotherapy: III. Reliability and validity of ‘Change after Psychotherapy.‘ Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 47(1), 44-52.

Sapyta, J., Riemer, M., & Bickman, L. (2005). Feedback to clinicians: Theory, research, and practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 145–153. doi:10.1002/jclp.20107

Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M. J., & Smart, D. W. (2010). Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(3), 298–311. doi:10.1037/a0019247

Simon, W., Lambert, M. J., Busath, G., Vazquez, A., Berkeljon, A., Hyer, K., … Berrett, M. (2013). Effects of providing patient progress feedback and clinical support tools to psychotherapists in an inpatient eating disorders treatment program: A randomized controlled study. Psychotherapy Research, 23(3), 287–300. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.787497

Simon, W., Lambert, M. J., Harris, M. W., Busath, G., & Vazquez, A. (2012). Providing patient progress information and clinical support tools to therapists: Effects on patients at risk of treatment failure. Psychotherapy Research, 22(6), 638–647. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.698918

Slade, K., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, S. C., Smart, D. W., & Bailey, R. (2008). Improving psychotherapy outcome: The use of immediate electronic feedback and revised clinical support tools. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 15(5), 287–303. doi:10.1002/cpp.594

Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. The American Psychologist, 32(9), 752–60. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.32.9.752

Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V, & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Smits, D. F., Claes, L., Stinckens, N., & Smits, D. J. M. (2015). Clinicians’ attitudes towards outcome and process monitoring: A validation of the Outcome Measurement Questionnaire. Administration and Policy in Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 634–641. doi:10.1007/s10488-014-0597-6

Tasca, G. A., & Gallop, R. (2009). Multilevel modeling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers: I. The basics. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4-5), 429–437. doi:10.1080/10503300802641444

Timuľák, L. (2005). Současný výzkum psychoterapie. Praha: Triton.

Youn, S. J., Kraus, D. R., & Castonguay, L. G. (2012). The treatment outcome package: Facilitating practice and clinically relevant research. Psychotherapy, 49(2), 115–122. doi:10.1037/a0027932

Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wells, M. G., Burlingame, G. M., Lambert, M. J., Hoag, M. J., & Hope, C. A. (1996). Conceptualization and measurement of patient change during psychotherapy: Development of the Outcome Questionnaire and Youth Outcome Questionnaire. Psychotherapy, 33(2), 275–283. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.33.2.275

Whipple, J. L., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2003). Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment and problem-solving strategies in routine practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(1), 59–68. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.50.1.59

White, M. M., Lambert, M. J., Ogles, B. M., Mclaughlin, S. B., Bailey, R. J., & Tingey, K. M. (2015). Using the Assessment for Signal Clients as a feedback tool for reducing treatment failure. Psychotherapy Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10503307.2015.1009862

Zatloukal, L. (2012). Komunikace v psychoterapeutické praxi a terapeutická změna (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://theses.cz/id/ays9yk/00181958-296271926.pdf
Metriky

0

Crossref logo

0


747

Views

635

PDF views